chanduv23
03-11 01:22 PM
Hi,
I am Us citizen and sent a request letter with my Mom to US Embassy in Armenia to kindly grant my Mom a tourist visa to visit me and my new born son. I also signed and sent dully filled and signed Affidavit of Support form with all the requested paper work. However, my Mom was denied the tourist visa on the grounds that I did not returned to Armenia in 2000 (8 years Ago) before my J1 Visa expiration.
But I got visa extension befor J1 visa expiration then applied for permanent resident and got my green card).
I did not violate any regulation.
What can I do ? Please Help.
I think a good Attorney can draft a letter to the consulate explaining the waiver.
Don't we all agree that these agencies actually need lawyers and not us?
I am Us citizen and sent a request letter with my Mom to US Embassy in Armenia to kindly grant my Mom a tourist visa to visit me and my new born son. I also signed and sent dully filled and signed Affidavit of Support form with all the requested paper work. However, my Mom was denied the tourist visa on the grounds that I did not returned to Armenia in 2000 (8 years Ago) before my J1 Visa expiration.
But I got visa extension befor J1 visa expiration then applied for permanent resident and got my green card).
I did not violate any regulation.
What can I do ? Please Help.
I think a good Attorney can draft a letter to the consulate explaining the waiver.
Don't we all agree that these agencies actually need lawyers and not us?
wallpaper Plastic 3D Glasses for Real D
ychuck
04-28 08:06 AM
I do not know about I485...
but it is not hard to get copies of W2. IRS has a service that will give you copies of your fed tax papers including W2s in 60 days. You can also ask you employer, they ususlay keep a copy.
but it is not hard to get copies of W2. IRS has a service that will give you copies of your fed tax papers including W2s in 60 days. You can also ask you employer, they ususlay keep a copy.
Openarms
03-24 02:10 PM
Well they may created it new but the content is old and system needs to be fixed.
2011 glasses RealD 3D glasses
thesparky007
06-06 11:20 AM
lmao!
you need a price for all of them
they look good
you need a price for all of them
they look good
more...
jsb
09-05 10:09 PM
Hi,
I am writing here for the first time.
My checks got encashed only for EAD/AP.
I filed concurrently I140/485 and PD is 2006.
Can some one tell if this is normal?
Thanks
This is thread for I-485 status check with USCIS customer service !!!
I am writing here for the first time.
My checks got encashed only for EAD/AP.
I filed concurrently I140/485 and PD is 2006.
Can some one tell if this is normal?
Thanks
This is thread for I-485 status check with USCIS customer service !!!
jackie3
05-07 05:42 AM
hi jase21. i think .net is the best programming language till date. wat do u think?
more...
rajmehrotra
10-19 09:46 AM
one will get GC awarded if he crosses border illegally and becomes a victim.
This is insane.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_re_us/immigrant_victim_visa
Let us keep the focus on our issue. What are we going to protest next? Family-Based Immigrant Visas, which are given out, without any real numerical limits, only because someone is related to a citizen?
The "U" visas are for people who have suffered violence in indescribable ways. Despite the limbo the EB Visa beneficiaries face, let us not even begin comparing our predicament with the sometimes life-ending plight of people who qualify for "U" visas.
This is insane.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_re_us/immigrant_victim_visa
Let us keep the focus on our issue. What are we going to protest next? Family-Based Immigrant Visas, which are given out, without any real numerical limits, only because someone is related to a citizen?
The "U" visas are for people who have suffered violence in indescribable ways. Despite the limbo the EB Visa beneficiaries face, let us not even begin comparing our predicament with the sometimes life-ending plight of people who qualify for "U" visas.
2010 hot Works with Real D 3D
akkakarla
08-22 08:22 PM
Actions speak louder than words. If they are deeply concerned then they should be taking steps forward to make something happen.
more...
royalchallenge
11-17 04:23 PM
Just got fired from my company.
I have concrete reasons to believe that it was an act of retaliation. I have documentary evidence for that.
I want to sue the company for damages. However, any such legal case must be fought on a pro-bono basis as I do not intend to spend my money on fighting this case.
If any lawyer is interested in taking up this case, please send me a private message/email with their phone numbers. I will provide further details on the phone.
Thanks all.
I have concrete reasons to believe that it was an act of retaliation. I have documentary evidence for that.
I want to sue the company for damages. However, any such legal case must be fought on a pro-bono basis as I do not intend to spend my money on fighting this case.
If any lawyer is interested in taking up this case, please send me a private message/email with their phone numbers. I will provide further details on the phone.
Thanks all.
hair Kids Real D style 3D
LONGGCQUE
09-26 11:29 AM
no issues. My mom travelled to mumbai from chicago via frankfurt on AI. everything went well.. no issues on wheel chair as they took care of her well in transit and dropped her at the gate.
She did report issues in mumbai when she landed as it took 30 mins for wheel chair person to arrive at the gate... same AI has pathetic service in india and they are OK in US.
hope this helps..
She did report issues in mumbai when she landed as it took 30 mins for wheel chair person to arrive at the gate... same AI has pathetic service in india and they are OK in US.
hope this helps..
more...
Ahjeet
12-04 09:16 PM
Thank you for response.
I checked with attorney and I believe that is true, PP for H1b is not carried over on RFE reply. Response to RFE will go in a regular queue for evaluation. But, I hope this is not the case.
Yes, I read in forums RFE's and 221g both have become more regular these days.
I'll let the forum know outcome of this case. Thank you for visiting this thread!
I checked with attorney and I believe that is true, PP for H1b is not carried over on RFE reply. Response to RFE will go in a regular queue for evaluation. But, I hope this is not the case.
Yes, I read in forums RFE's and 221g both have become more regular these days.
I'll let the forum know outcome of this case. Thank you for visiting this thread!
hot REAL D Polarised 3D Glasses
pappu
03-10 04:33 PM
Thanks. Any ideas how we can make the WIKI popular. We should make this a useful resource for everyone.
more...
house 3D glasses. , RealD, Cinema
miaj
01-30 11:20 AM
please sign the petition to resolve 212(a)(3)(B) issue @
Please Fix the Material Support Bar - 212(a)(3)(B) | | (http://www..com/2/2819/please-fix-matrial-support-bar-212-3-b/)
Thank you
Please Fix the Material Support Bar - 212(a)(3)(B) | | (http://www..com/2/2819/please-fix-matrial-support-bar-212-3-b/)
Thank you
tattoo Rather than requiring 3D
theMan
01-14 12:17 PM
No issues on both fronts as long as you have adhered to the terms and conditions while obtaining the Canadian Visa. I had similar circumstances in the recent past.
A factor to consider is the unpredictable time spent at the secondary inspection when returning. I am not sure how that will work when you drive across the border.
A factor to consider is the unpredictable time spent at the secondary inspection when returning. I am not sure how that will work when you drive across the border.
more...
pictures Bring your 3D glasses take a
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
dresses 3d plastic glasses, real D
tradahoo
09-04 08:10 PM
Hi,
Anyone knows about filing for PERM on the 6th year of H1B? Will it still eligible for H1B extension?
Anyone knows about filing for PERM on the 6th year of H1B? Will it still eligible for H1B extension?
more...
makeup Harry Potter design 3d glasses
Steve Mitchell
February 11th, 2006, 08:12 AM
Nikon has acknowledged a limited number of early production D200's may be afflicted with a banding problem. To read Nikon's official stance on the issue, read here (http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=13872).
girlfriend Any 3D glasses are worse than
cableching
07-27 01:52 PM
H
Even I changed my address last month. No RFE.
Now Again I want to chnage. I want to know If I just submit AR11 online, without updating the pending applications ( not expecing any communication for CIS next couple of months). Will they look in to AR11 and issue RFE(If at all).OR it is just a record no one care unless you chnage the pending applications.
Thanks
It is a "MUST" to update address on all the pending applications too. Look at the below thread for more info...
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum72-ac21-portability-after-180-days-of-485-filing/161016-does-ar11-change-of-address-trigger-rfe-for-evl.html#post487007
Even I changed my address last month. No RFE.
Now Again I want to chnage. I want to know If I just submit AR11 online, without updating the pending applications ( not expecing any communication for CIS next couple of months). Will they look in to AR11 and issue RFE(If at all).OR it is just a record no one care unless you chnage the pending applications.
Thanks
It is a "MUST" to update address on all the pending applications too. Look at the below thread for more info...
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum72-ac21-portability-after-180-days-of-485-filing/161016-does-ar11-change-of-address-trigger-rfe-for-evl.html#post487007
hairstyles RealD
test101
07-17 08:44 PM
what happenes if my lawyer does not send tax return with I-485?
wata
06-21 07:51 PM
Friends,
I got LC and 140 approved in EB3. Now I refile my labor Cert in EB2 (IT manager) via PERM. Anybody has the same experience and know approximately processing time for this PERM to be approved. Thanks for any information.
I got LC and 140 approved in EB3. Now I refile my labor Cert in EB2 (IT manager) via PERM. Anybody has the same experience and know approximately processing time for this PERM to be approved. Thanks for any information.
WaitingUnlimited
01-18 12:43 PM
First of all, Welcome to Immigration Voice!!
It is possible to get 3 year extension on while you transfer h1b to new company and also obtain the first priority date. First priority date can be obtained while applying for another 140 with new company by attaching the copy of 140 document. But some people say that just mentioning the LIN # is sufficient enough.
What your attorney is saying is true, 140 is owned by the company. But you may request your HR about the value of 140 in extending your stay in US and also in pursuing the green card. That is what I did while changing the job and then our HR did not cancel the 140.
You may lose the priority date if your HR cancels the 140 but some people say that there is a circulation in USCIS which says that even if the 140 is canceled, the first priority date can be assigned as the green card processing was indeed started at the first priority date, so may be it depends on the officer who is handling your case.
Good Luck!!
It is possible to get 3 year extension on while you transfer h1b to new company and also obtain the first priority date. First priority date can be obtained while applying for another 140 with new company by attaching the copy of 140 document. But some people say that just mentioning the LIN # is sufficient enough.
What your attorney is saying is true, 140 is owned by the company. But you may request your HR about the value of 140 in extending your stay in US and also in pursuing the green card. That is what I did while changing the job and then our HR did not cancel the 140.
You may lose the priority date if your HR cancels the 140 but some people say that there is a circulation in USCIS which says that even if the 140 is canceled, the first priority date can be assigned as the green card processing was indeed started at the first priority date, so may be it depends on the officer who is handling your case.
Good Luck!!
No comments:
Post a Comment